Skip to content
Why we built Vorthix XOR-1 to answer “insufficient evidence” when it has not earned a conclusion

About Vorthix Sec

Security research built on evidence, not promises

Vorthix Sec is a team of security researchers and AI engineers. We build Vorthix XOR-1, an AI-driven cyber reasoning engine for software security.

Who is Vorthix?

Vorthix Sec is the company behind Vorthix XOR-1. We combine security research with AI engineering to find, test and explain vulnerabilities in source code and compiled binaries. We are a young company, so we do not ask you to take our word for anything: ask us the hard questions and we will answer them with evidence or tell you honestly that we do not know yet.

Why Vorthix exists

A skilled researcher can review one codebase at a time and works a fixed number of hours. Scanners are fast but flag patterns without knowing whether a weakness can be reached. Teams end up either re-checking every alert or waiting for the next manual engagement.

We built Vorthix XOR-1 to do the patient, adversarial reading that a human researcher would do: form a hypothesis, read the source, test it and revise. The harder problem is trust over a long, unsupervised run, which is why the engine is built around an evidence standard and why it is allowed to say “insufficient evidence”. The reasoning is explained in why we built Vorthix XOR-1.

Our work covers 14 languages and two input types, source code and compiled binaries. See the solutions and industries we support.

Principles

How we work

01

Evidence before conclusions

A conclusion is accepted only when specific evidence from the code supports it. Confident wording is not evidence.

02

Honest about uncertainty

“Insufficient evidence” is a valid result. We prefer an honest unknown to a confident guess that hides a real issue.

03

Fixes are claims

A merged patch is a claim about the code. We test whether it holds on every path that shares its assumption.

04

People stay accountable

Vorthix XOR-1 does the long, patient work. The Vorthix research team reviews every finding before it reaches you.

05

Coordinated disclosure

Issues in third-party software go to maintainers first. Public write-ups follow the fix, not the discovery.

06

Open-source infrastructure first

Parsers, cryptographic libraries and protocol stacks sit under thousands of products. A fix there protects all of them.

Research approach

Targets are built with runtime instrumentation before analysis starts, so memory-safety and undefined-behavior problems surface deterministically instead of corrupting state silently. Vorthix XOR-1 builds focused harnesses for high-priority code, runs adversarial tests and adapts the next hypothesis from what actually happened. Patch review uses call-graph and data-flow analysis to check every place a fix’s assumption is supposed to hold. Read the method in how Vorthix XOR-1 works or the glossary entry for proof-based security research.

Responsible disclosure

Findings in third-party open-source software follow coordinated disclosure. They are reported privately to the maintainer or vendor through a security advisory, a dedicated security contact or the relevant CVE Numbering Authority, with the reproducer, trace, root cause and a suggested patch. Public write-ups publish once a fix is available. Anything from a client engagement stays private to that client. To report an issue in Vorthix itself, see our security policy.

Published research

Coordinated disclosures

Selected findings that have been through coordinated disclosure. Each has a full write-up with the evidence.

See all research

Contact

General questions and access requests: contact@vorthix.com. Security reports: security@vorthix.com. Or use the contact form.

Request access

See how Vorthix works on your code

Access is currently by request for security teams and researchers.

Get startedContact the team
  • Working proof of concept
  • Sanitizer-backed trace
  • Suggested patch and regression test